Skip to content

A more beautiful perspective

History of Makeup is a reference for the history of beauty — what people wore, what it was made of, and what it meant.

Eight cosmetic artefacts set out on torn parchment in two rows like a timeline: a lump of red ochre, an alabaster kohl pot painted with two eyes and its wooden applicator, an open red-and-black lacquer box, an iridescent Roman glass bottle, an enamel patch box with a painted rose, a porcelain cup glinting green-gold with dried safflower red, an engraved gilt lipstick beside its cap and a modern plum lipstick.
Commissioned illustration
Articles
131
Product guides
161
Ingredients
40
Sources cited
864
Places on the atlas
94
Hours of narration
16.8

Makeup has one of the longest continuous histories of any human craft and one of the least reliable records. It has been written about as vanity, as scandal, as trivia — rarely as what it actually is: a material practice with chemistry, economics, technique and meaning behind every choice. This site treats it as the second thing.

A 1920s collage: a woman with a dark finger-waved bob and deep plum lipstick, beside a torn magazine cover, a gold lipstick tube and a scatter of pressed rouge.
Commissioned illustration

What a face looked like

Every era, culture, person and object here is a full article with sources.

A heavy lump of dull brownish-red ore with grey rock clinging along one side and bright scarlet faces where it has split, beside a coarse brown-red grind of it and a heap of fine, intensely scarlet powder.
Commissioned illustration

What it was made of

Alongside them sits a dictionary of makeup ingredients — what each one is, where it came from, what it does, and what is actually known about its safety.

Open the dictionary 40 ingredients

The two halves answer different questions and are meant to be read together: an article tells you what a face looked like in 1924, and the dictionary tells you what it was made of.

What this site is careful about

Beauty history is unusually full of confidently-repeated fiction. Victorian women did not widely eat arsenic wafers for complexion. Cleopatra's cosmetics are described far more precisely than the evidence allows. These stories survive because they are enjoyable and because nobody checks.

So the rule here is simple and mechanical:any claim attached to a date carries a citation, and the build refuses to publish a section that breaks it.

That is not a promise of perfection — it is a constraint that makes the errors findable. Where the evidence is thin, the article says so rather than choosing the better story.

How the articles are sourced

Who writes it

The research, writing and editing are done by the site's editorial team working from published scholarship, primary sources, museum catalogues and patent records. The full method, including where software assists and where it does not, is set out in Editorial Standards.

Corrections

If something here is wrong, it should be fixed. Corrections are made to the article itself, with the change noted, rather than quietly. Write to hello@historyofmakeup.com, or through the form below, with the page and the source, and it will be looked at.

Commercial links

Some articles link to products a reader can buy, and some of those links earn a commission. Nothing is written because it can be sold, and the arrangement is described in full in the affiliate disclosure.

Write to us

Choose what you are writing about and write to us here. We answer by email.

What it's about

A correction, a question, a story we should tell, or simply hello. Choose a reason, or just write.

Where we will answer you.

We keep your letter and your address to answer you, and for nothing else. Letters are deleted 12 months after they arrive, or sooner if you ask. How we look after them

Or write from your own mail to